Still trying to wrap my head around section 6 and the multiple jammer scenarios…
Well, say that jammer A is seated, and jammer B is on her way to the box. If jammer C manages to get there first, all jammers must be held for the duration of the period.
It seems like the jammer section is a really confusing reiteration of the current wording with a provision added for jammers that leave early.
At least I hope so.