The Whendigo's Lair

mumblenews:

thegreatwadesby:

mumblenews:

thegreatwadesby:

mumblenews:

thegreatwadesby:

mumblenews:

thegreatwadesby:

mumblenews:

thegreatwadesby:

mumblenews:

thegreatwadesby:

mumblenews:

Super sick of these entitled males coming up in women’s space and telling us how to run things. Let’s get this straight, if you are a man, you CANNOT:

-critique feminism (unless you feel you are being oppressed along other axes, i.e. are LGTQIA or black or disabled)

-say the word “bitch”

…

{as I know this is directed towards me}

-I do feel like I am being oppressed. There are certain things that I cannot do because of weight. If you care for me to explain, I can.

-Also, I gave you the definition that is the most broadcasted version, whereas I simply want it changed to a movement for equal rights not according to gender, race, sexuality, etc.

Fat shaming is a valid oppression but it doesn’t mean you’re allowed to bust in to women-run spaces and tell us SHIT. Also ffs google intersectional feminism. Men don’t need more rights. They have no oppressions. The vast majority of the abuse they face is from EACH OTHER, because of the patriarchy valuing traditional masculinity over femininity. You’re not oppressed because you are a man, you’re mocked because you don’t follow the patriarchy’s rules. As a man, however, you have power to change it. But you don’t. You whine about how feminism doesn’t include you. So sorry if I have no sympathy.

The fact that you actually think its fat shaming.
Also, I’m not telling you “SHIT” thank you.
I’m not saying men need more rights. Actually, I never said that. You blankly stated that I cannot ask for equal rights, unless I’m oppressed, WHEN I AM.

Also, I do follow those rules. You don’t know me.

I’m not whining that it doesn’t include me, IM WHINING HOW THE MOST BROADCASTED TERM IS SO SEXIST THAT IT WON’T STAND FOR EQUAL RIGHTS FOR EVERYONE.

Ok, google these terms:

-systematic oppression

-social justice ally

-FEMINISM. And actually LOOK AT IT. ESPECIALLY INTERSECTIONAL FEMINISM.

Then learn when a member of an actually oppressed group is telling you to step. The fuck. Off. This is like a third grader trying to teach a college student algebra, seriously.

Also there’s no such thing as sexism against men. And no racism against white people. Don’t believe what the white supremacist patriarchy defines things as, they skew it in their favor.

I’m not even going to spend my time researching for you because you just downgraded yourself to being racist and sexist

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

THIS IS IT EVERYONE. IT FINALLY HAPPENED. I WAS FINALLY CALLED A RACIST AND SEXIST FOR NOT CATERING TO WHITE PEOPLE AND MEN.

The tumblr right of passage has finally come!

How much do you wanna bet he’s “colorblind?”

I bet ten bucks you’re a bitch.

Oh look a sexist slur! :D I think I’ve hit bingo.

I was actually using it ironically. And I think I’ve hit bingo with the fact that I CAN CALL YOU A BITCH IF I WANT TO AND NOW YOU ARE DEGRADING MEN WHO CALL GIRL BITCHES BUT YOU CAN CALL YOUR GAL PAL A BIRCH AND IT BE OKAY? {I think I’ve hit bingo with sexism}

Yeah? You can’t use the “n” word either. Because women and black people are ACTUALLY OPPRESSED. You are not. You can be bullied, depressed and have a shitty life, but you’re not oppressed. Sorry.

AND THAT’S WHEN I HIT BINGO WITH RACISM

And I’m sorry if I am denied from entering the military because of weight. I guess that’s bullying not oppression. I’m sorry men have been so been given the stereotype that he must pay for dinner and open and hold doers for ladies that its not polite anymore ITS DEMANDED

I’m literally laughing out loud. Like I give a fuck if you hold doors or pay for food. You don’t know how patriarchy works. Fat oppression is a thing, but it doesn’t give you a right to tell women what to do. This is not. Hard.

Wait. I just read the word fairism.

How can you treat others differently because of their fairness?

mumblenews:

thegreatwadesby:

mumblenews:

thegreatwadesby:

mumblenews:

thegreatwadesby:

mumblenews:

thegreatwadesby:

mumblenews:

thegreatwadesby:

mumblenews:

thegreatwadesby:

mumblenews:

Super sick of these entitled males coming up in women’s space and telling us how to run things. Let’s get this straight, if you are a man, you CANNOT:

-critique feminism (unless you feel you are being oppressed along other axes, i.e. are LGTQIA or black or disabled)

-say the word “bitch”

…

{as I know this is directed towards me}

-I do feel like I am being oppressed. There are certain things that I cannot do because of weight. If you care for me to explain, I can.

-Also, I gave you the definition that is the most broadcasted version, whereas I simply want it changed to a movement for equal rights not according to gender, race, sexuality, etc.

Fat shaming is a valid oppression but it doesn’t mean you’re allowed to bust in to women-run spaces and tell us SHIT. Also ffs google intersectional feminism. Men don’t need more rights. They have no oppressions. The vast majority of the abuse they face is from EACH OTHER, because of the patriarchy valuing traditional masculinity over femininity. You’re not oppressed because you are a man, you’re mocked because you don’t follow the patriarchy’s rules. As a man, however, you have power to change it. But you don’t. You whine about how feminism doesn’t include you. So sorry if I have no sympathy.

The fact that you actually think its fat shaming.
Also, I’m not telling you “SHIT” thank you.
I’m not saying men need more rights. Actually, I never said that. You blankly stated that I cannot ask for equal rights, unless I’m oppressed, WHEN I AM.

Also, I do follow those rules. You don’t know me.

I’m not whining that it doesn’t include me, IM WHINING HOW THE MOST BROADCASTED TERM IS SO SEXIST THAT IT WON’T STAND FOR EQUAL RIGHTS FOR EVERYONE.

Ok, google these terms:

-systematic oppression

-social justice ally

-FEMINISM. And actually LOOK AT IT. ESPECIALLY INTERSECTIONAL FEMINISM.

Then learn when a member of an actually oppressed group is telling you to step. The fuck. Off. This is like a third grader trying to teach a college student algebra, seriously.

Also there’s no such thing as sexism against men. And no racism against white people. Don’t believe what the white supremacist patriarchy defines things as, they skew it in their favor.

I’m not even going to spend my time researching for you because you just downgraded yourself to being racist and sexist

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

THIS IS IT EVERYONE. IT FINALLY HAPPENED. I WAS FINALLY CALLED A RACIST AND SEXIST FOR NOT CATERING TO WHITE PEOPLE AND MEN.

The tumblr right of passage has finally come!

How much do you wanna bet he’s “colorblind?”

I bet ten bucks you’re a bitch.

Oh look a sexist slur! :D I think I’ve hit bingo.

I was actually using it ironically. And I think I’ve hit bingo with the fact that I CAN CALL YOU A BITCH IF I WANT TO AND NOW YOU ARE DEGRADING MEN WHO CALL GIRL BITCHES BUT YOU CAN CALL YOUR GAL PAL A BIRCH AND IT BE OKAY? {I think I’ve hit bingo with sexism}

Yeah? You can’t use the “n” word either. Because women and black people are ACTUALLY OPPRESSED. You are not. You can be bullied, depressed and have a shitty life, but you’re not oppressed. Sorry.

AND THAT’S WHEN I HIT BINGO WITH RACISM

And I’m sorry if I am denied from entering the military because of weight. I guess that’s bullying not oppression. I’m sorry men have been so been given the stereotype that he must pay for dinner and open and hold doers for ladies that its not polite anymore ITS DEMANDED

I’m literally laughing out loud. Like I give a fuck if you hold doors or pay for food. You don’t know how patriarchy works. Fat oppression is a thing, but it doesn’t give you a right to tell women what to do. This is not. Hard.

I’m with mumble on this one. As a depressed, picked on white male, I have never experienced oppression.

Denial is not oppression, you choose to be fat. (Of course there are exceptions, but that isnt the point.) The military may not want you, but neither does the NBA. Who cares?

An individual cant really be oppressed, it takes a whole demographic.

mumblenews:

will-venture:

the1janitor:

Dear Internet, 

I understand your (justifiable) problem with the concept of “The Friend Zone,” but can we please stop referencing this strawman where we classify all guys who are frustrated in their inability getting the girls they like as “assholes who think they deserve sex.” That’s a bit oversimplified and a bit unfair. Obviously the thought that you are ‘owed something’ from a girl (not matter what it is you think you are owed) is ridiculous, and there are some guys who think the thing they are ‘owed’ is sex.

But that does not represent the thought process of all (or even, I imagine, a majority) of guys who talk about the friend-zone. These are guys who want companionship. They want (or at least they think they want) to be in a relationship. Summing them up as “thinking they deserve sex” is a bit rude. In fact, there are instances of guys who are granted sex from a girl, but still consider themselves in “the friend zone.”

The idea of “the friend-zone” is based on a (sometimes willful) ignorance about the way people work, but the solution to ignorance is knowledge, not yelling at people and making outlandish accusations. I have heard people say “there’s no such thing as the friend zone,” which I’m not sure what that even means. “The Friend Zone” is a clearly a thing insomuch as it is obviously possible for a guy to have unrequited affection from a friend of his.

The discrepancy is the idea that girls are “wrong” or “cruel” or “stupid” for putting people in the friend-zone, which is obviously ridiculous, and in fact the imagery of a girl “putting” someone in the friend zone is kind of bizarre in and of itself, as if they have a list of friends and they just put a friend-zone check mark next to certain ones.

From a heterosexual male perspective, being “friend-zoned” is only a big deal if you are singularly focused on romance above all, which as I have said and will continue to say, is lame and bad for you. I get crushes on girls from time to time and sometimes those girls decide they only want o be friends with me, which sucks a little bit but like, ultimately why is that even a big deal? Just move on. There are still lots of other cool things in life.

But, again, from a straight male perspective, I believe that being considered completely “undateable” or “unfuckable” is something that you bring about yourself by being passive or pathetic.

Now, obviously girls are human beings and they have their own preferences and you may just not fit into what they’re looking for. But that’s not the same as being “friend-zoned.” Most mature girls will give a guy a chance if he’s cool and not pathetic, even if they don’t immediately click. I have many female friends who I’m pretty sure have no romantic feelings for me, and I’m willing to bet I could score a date with most of them if I wanted to.

Anyway I’m digressing, the point is, I think when you’re young and you’re a very caring and polite young man, you may be legitimately frustrated about why girls sometimes go for guys who are rude or pretentious rather than guys like you, and I think this is a legitimate concern, it’s an easily answered question that’s based on ignorance, but it’s still understandable why someone may have this line of thinking. And the solution to this kind of concern to to drop some knowledge, and explain how things really work. Not saying “fuck you, you sexist asshole, you just only want sex!”

das jus me doe

Guys guys guys guys guys guys guys guys guys guys guys male

Girls girls girls girls girls girls girls girls girls girls girls

Female

Why do boys get twelve adult pronouns but women only get one?

Wow I can’t handle all this concern trolling.

Not trolling really. I just couldn’t see why someone is concerned with being friendzoned by a child.

the1janitor:

Dear Internet, 

I understand your (justifiable) problem with the concept of “The Friend Zone,” but can we please stop referencing this strawman where we classify all guys who are frustrated in their inability getting the girls they like as “assholes who think they deserve sex.” That’s a bit oversimplified and a bit unfair. Obviously the thought that you are ‘owed something’ from a girl (not matter what it is you think you are owed) is ridiculous, and there are some guys who think the thing they are ‘owed’ is sex.

But that does not represent the thought process of all (or even, I imagine, a majority) of guys who talk about the friend-zone. These are guys who want companionship. They want (or at least they think they want) to be in a relationship. Summing them up as “thinking they deserve sex” is a bit rude. In fact, there are instances of guys who are granted sex from a girl, but still consider themselves in “the friend zone.”

The idea of “the friend-zone” is based on a (sometimes willful) ignorance about the way people work, but the solution to ignorance is knowledge, not yelling at people and making outlandish accusations. I have heard people say “there’s no such thing as the friend zone,” which I’m not sure what that even means. “The Friend Zone” is a clearly a thing insomuch as it is obviously possible for a guy to have unrequited affection from a friend of his.

The discrepancy is the idea that girls are “wrong” or “cruel” or “stupid” for putting people in the friend-zone, which is obviously ridiculous, and in fact the imagery of a girl “putting” someone in the friend zone is kind of bizarre in and of itself, as if they have a list of friends and they just put a friend-zone check mark next to certain ones.

From a heterosexual male perspective, being “friend-zoned” is only a big deal if you are singularly focused on romance above all, which as I have said and will continue to say, is lame and bad for you. I get crushes on girls from time to time and sometimes those girls decide they only want o be friends with me, which sucks a little bit but like, ultimately why is that even a big deal? Just move on. There are still lots of other cool things in life.

But, again, from a straight male perspective, I believe that being considered completely “undateable” or “unfuckable” is something that you bring about yourself by being passive or pathetic.

Now, obviously girls are human beings and they have their own preferences and you may just not fit into what they’re looking for. But that’s not the same as being “friend-zoned.” Most mature girls will give a guy a chance if he’s cool and not pathetic, even if they don’t immediately click. I have many female friends who I’m pretty sure have no romantic feelings for me, and I’m willing to bet I could score a date with most of them if I wanted to.

Anyway I’m digressing, the point is, I think when you’re young and you’re a very caring and polite young man, you may be legitimately frustrated about why girls sometimes go for guys who are rude or pretentious rather than guys like you, and I think this is a legitimate concern, it’s an easily answered question that’s based on ignorance, but it’s still understandable why someone may have this line of thinking. And the solution to this kind of concern to to drop some knowledge, and explain how things really work. Not saying “fuck you, you sexist asshole, you just only want sex!”

das jus me doe

Guys guys guys guys guys guys guys guys guys guys guys male

Girls girls girls girls girls girls girls girls girls girls girls

Female

Why do boys get twelve adult pronouns but women only get one?